Avengers Infinity War theory: Thanos Snap wasnt about lack of resources or overpopulation

What If…?: Marvel tease Disney+ animated superhero series

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info

During Avengers Infinity War, Thanos set out to collect all six Infinity Stones so he could snap away half of all living things at random. From the Mad Titan’s point of view, this genocidal action to kill trillions was a moral one. Largely it’s thought that Thanos did this because of a lack of resources in the face of overpopulation and to prevent what is known as a Malthusian catastrophe.

However, a popular new fan theory argues that Thanos’ Snap was routed in the philosophy of Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan.

Published in 1651 during the English Civil War, the British philosopher’s book was named after the biblical creature mentioned in Job.

In summary, Hobbes’ early social contract theory argued for rule by an absolute sovereign.

Reddit user IsaiasRi argues: “Thanos did The Snap because he wants to be the Leviathan – of Thomas Hobbes.”

The theorist wrote: “The Leviathan is a book that has sold millions of copies because of this one quote: ‘This makes it obvious that for as long as men live without a common power to keep them all in awe, they are in the condition known as war; and it is a war of every man against every man.’

“A war of every man against every man. An Infinity War if you will. The Common Power, the Leviathan, is a being with power so great that men are in awe, and Hobbes presents that this shock and fear is what will ultimately preserve peace.”

“This is why the Snap is not about the lack of resources. Doubling the resources will not extinguish the war of every man against every man.”

They argued that The Snap is a demonstration of absolute power that will be remembered and feared for generations to come.

The theorist continued: “When Thanos explains this to Doctor Strange, he is not speaking as ecologist or as an economist. He speaks of himself as a merciful God-King. He is preaching.”

But when the 2014 Thanos variant in Avengers Endgame discovers that he’s executed by Thor after the Snap and his plan is being reversed through time travel, he changes his philosophy.

They wrote: “In Endgame, when Thanos meets Cap, Thor and Iron Man, he looks authentically defeated.

“He now knows that it is not enough to be feared or admired as a God-King, because resentment towards the Leviathan will prevent true peace.”

DON’T MISS
Avengers Endgame plot hole: Fans love easier time travel heist plan [PLOT HOLE]

Avengers Infinity War theory: Eitri made Thanos’ gauntlet out of greed [THEORY]
Tom Hardy: Marvel boss won’t rule out Venom Spider-Man MCU crossover [TOM HARDY]

They added: “His approach to Thomas Hobbes was wrong; he now knows that he needs to erase this universe, to become the Inevitable God-King of a different universe.”

But, of course, Iron Man manages to snap Thanos away before Thanos can snap away the universe.

Summing up the original argument, the theorist wrote: “Thanos is not an economist or an ecologist.

“He is a Leviathan, a political-religious figure who is trying to preserve peace through awe.”

READ THE REDDIT THEORY IN FULL HERE

Source: Read Full Article